To encourage the exchange of thoughts about Deepak Chopra and his work, we will post your comments, inquiries, and opinions. Please feel free to respond to someone else's comments or questions, or simply post your own.


Post a Message | Read the Forum | Sign the Guestbook

Please Post Your Comments

Name:

Email Address:

Comments:


We've modified our forum tool to make it more flexible and user-friendly. Read the instructions for tips on how to use the tool.

Messages to view at once:

Displaying messages 1 through 116 of 53865.

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >>


On Monday, October 9, 2000, Cathy
(catcta@aol.com)@64.12.104.33 said:
Anne

Are you sure you and Geoff aren't kin? :-) You both have the gift of a sense of humor!! Your kids (unless, of course, you are kin--in which case I wouldn't recommend having kids with each other ;-)) will be comic geniuses ;-) Thanks for the smiles...

Cathy


On Monday, October 9, 2000, Anne ()@203.10.72.215 said:
That interview also mentions 'spiritual egoism' which is a term I hadn't encountered b4. More food for thought. Bye now, must get back to pinning things on my wall ... :)

On Monday, October 9, 2000, Anne (Link?)@203.10.72.215 said:
Anyone know how to post a link? Funny thing, after reading geoff's excerpt I looked up 'satish kumar' and found an interesting interview with him.

http://www.context.org/ICLIB/IC17/Kumar.htm

The other funny thing is it mentions Gandhi (spelling?) ...


On Monday, October 9, 2000, Anne (Geoff)@203.10.72.215 said:
Geoff, don't leave us. We will be so lost and diminished without your presence! (presents?) I will miss your warmth, your wit and your wisdom. You say not to make 'comparisons' but your 'last post' was far and away the most _________ I have ever read.

And I should know - I am devoting my life to reading this entire forum over & over again. If message # 53, 840 is indeed your last (serious) visit then I intend to print it out and frame it and pin it on my bedroom wall right next to my autographed poster of Buddha on tour. I will read it with silence and reverence 47 times a day until I have fully absorbed and considered its vast implications. I intend to do this until I have attained full enlightenment which ought to take about six months or so. I would urge all Forum regulars (and even the irregulars) to do likewise.

I think I speak for everyone here when I say I want to have your children. You can read me a bedtime story anyday. I particularly like the one where Snow White and Goldilocks climb the magic beanstalk and discover the true nature of human consciousness and they all live happily ever after in a little town just outside of Moscow.

I propose that for the next six months we simply re-post the best of geoff's contirbutions until we fully understand them. He is surely our most sublime spiritual teacher since Sgt Schultz uttered those immortal words on Hogan's heroes:
"I know nothing."

I would urge anyone who reads this to go out into the world and preach the word of Geoff to all who have ears to listen. Go out into the forests and the deserts and scream these words into the great beyond. Then you can all pop over to my place for a bedtime story.

Thanks again.

Bon Voyage.

I love the Ghandi quote! though I can't recall seeing it anywhere else ... :)


On Monday, October 9, 2000, carol ()@38.37.124.190 said:
hi Jeff! great to see you here. :) looking forward to hearing about your trip. Namasté, dear friend.

On Monday, October 9, 2000, Daniel (dan@bigfoot.com)@192.149.148.6 said:

Swimming into a wave, if our timing is right, we feel it lift and propel us forward. It is exhilerating. Did you scream out to your friends the first time? I did. It was amazing. The roar of it was too much for anyone to hear my voice, but in the midst of that swirling foamy madness, I just wanted to share it. That is an addiction maker. Wow. I have had the most profound admiration for surfers after that. When I see them in traffic with their boards on the roof I wave or nod. Sometimes I will time my walk along the surf so that I can exchange a few words as they emerge. I love to watch the different syles. Some fight the wave's curl and slash about. Other's glide and dance on the water. I love to watch them, but most of all, I love to get right out there and feel that power around me. Waves are cool.

¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º


On Monday, October 9, 2000, Bob F ()@165.121.53.6 said:
Jeff - You are manifesting things very well - enjoy India and give us a report when you get back. Is Roxy going with you?

Sandy and I were considering going to HTKG and Jenny was even going to have us help her set up for a few days on the front end in exchange for some free room and board. However, we are just getting settled in Taos, I have been through the material with Deepak at the last two ASOSs and I estimated it would be 10k for the week and a half so we decided to pass this time around.

When you get back, please bring Roxy down and stay for a few days.

Namaste', Bob


On Monday, October 9, 2000, kereyra ()@132.254.130.52 said:
Ooops! Obviously, something is not right. My machine isn't updating posts. *sigh*

On Monday, October 9, 2000, k ()@132.254.130.52 said:
Don't tell me the forum is "closed" again?

On Monday, October 9, 2000, to (@)@216.236.5.32 said:
Namaste'

Nice to "see" you Jeff, and thanks for the report/info.

Have you got a big trunk you can put me in so I can join you on your trip?

Only I'd probably stay. In fact my landlord is from India, as well as a couple I converse with, and they outlined some places to visit, but none of the places coincide with the popular places except Vrindaban(sp?).

Have a beautiful trip.

Namaste'


On Monday, October 9, 2000, Jeff (jeffhart@concentric.net)@207.155.169.197 said:
And just to explain why I may not get back here for a while again, I will be making my first trip to India on Oct. 29 and will be gone about 3 weeks. I'll be attending Deepak's HTKG seminar and the PSM instructor's retreat. I'll try to check in here more frequently, and look forward to sharing my trip with you all when I return! Namaste, Jeff

On Monday, October 9, 2000, Jeff (jeffhart@concentric.net)@207.155.169.197 said:
I've also heard Deepak suggest that we silently repeat "Namaste" as we're looking at someone, even while they're talking to us. I must say it is very powerful! When I do that, I immediately "know" that me and the other person are truly "One." Namaste, Jeff

On Monday, October 9, 2000, Jeff (jeffhart@concentric.net)@207.155.169.197 said:
Hi Curious! And Hi my other Forum Friends! Well I'm glad that the first thing I'm able to do when I come back is to help another seeker along their path! (Forgive me however, as I've been away so long that I've obviously forgotten all the HTML formatting tricks, e.g., paragraphs.) Here it is anyway: NAMASTE' (NAW-MAW-STAY) NAMASTE' definition Short version: I honor the God within you! Long version: I honor that "place" within you, that When you are in that "place" within you, and I am in that "place" within me, There is only ONE OF US! BTW, it was dear TerryO that coaxed me back to say Hi! Namaste, Jeff

On Monday, October 9, 2000, -- ()@167.64.48.14 said:
Namaste

On Monday, October 9, 2000, Curious
()@194.170.163.98 said:
Why do people in this forum usually end at the word "Namaste" ? What does it mean? Is this forum devoted to promote thinking of a particular religion? What religion does Dr. Chopra follows? Thanks

On Monday, October 9, 2000, Peggy ()@209.86.48.80 said:
"The moment we begin to fear the opinions of others and hesitate to tell the truth that is in us, and from motives of policy are silent when we should speak, the divine floods of light and life no longer flow into our souls."
-- Elizabeth Cady Stanton, 1890

On Sunday, October 8, 2000, Elena Fischtel (fischkitroser@hotmail.com)@200.45.127.215 said:
Desearía que me informen si hay en Argentina,en Cordoba en especial. Medicos que sigan la línea Ayurvedica del Dr. Chopra para poder recibir mas informacion y atencion medica. Desde ya muchas gracias

On Sunday, October 8, 2000, rita guerreo (jlulli@iserv.net)@208.224.0.50 said:
I'm really interested in new-age support groups and the human mind. I have enjoyed several of deepaks books. If anyone would like to discuss anything from dreams, alternative healing, visions, channeling or other forms of spirituality please feel free to contact me. Im highly educated on these subjects and would enjoy talking with you. my address is 261 51st street grandjunction mi 49056 Sincerely Rita Guerrero

On Sunday, October 8, 2000, MARTA INÊS DORNELLES MACEDO (mdim@cpovo.net)@200.248.244.77 said:
Caros amigos !!! Assisti o vídeo e li o livro "As Sete Leis Espirituais do Sucesso", estou praticando uma por dia e divulgando as mesmas com amigos. Gostaria de participar da Rede Global para o Sucesso Espiritual, ser informada do desenvolvimento da Rede e receber material. Muito Obrigada. Com carinho Marta.

On Sunday, October 8, 2000, carol (~~~~~~~dancin'~~~~~~~~)@38.37.124.199 said:
haha! and wow! and "wonder"ful! great stuff these minds are made of....

hey Dave - way down there you said you liked my haiku, good. :) and you mentioned something about hard feelings, none here.

and as Hadi said the other day "Let's Dance!

here's wishing all a good day and Namasté, Forum Friends


On Sunday, October 8, 2000, kereyra ()@148.223.118.171 said:
Peggy, your sense of wicked humor never ceases to amaze me! You bring me smiles!

Geoff, your "meanderings" are so thought-provoking. I appreciate the charm in your writing.

Hadi, if you're reading out there, greetings and good wishes for you.

It's the middle of the night and I'm too tired to write much more. I can sympathize with whoever had that experience with the rogue post. The other day, I wrote a long post and it disappeared into cyberspace, never made it here in any form! So many people have told me that computers do only what you tell them to do...I'm sure this is a false statement...mine has a mind of its own...sneaky little thing.

Good night all!


On Saturday, October 7, 2000, Cathy (Catcta@aol.com)@64.12.104.38 said:
Geoff

You are such a nut...and I mean that in the best possible way :-) Ever seen the bumper sticker..."Those who wander aren't necessarily lost :-)" or something similar....

Your posts are great and very useful and thought-provoking...Have you ever read Lila by Robert Pirsig? Did I ask you this before?

you know, for me at least, talking with people like this (via the internet) is not "real" in the usual respects...you all are like disembodied voices to me (I don't mean that in a bad way, btw :-)) because I have never seen any of you or talked to you to hear your voice...."you" are not you when you post, and so this desire of yours to become unattached to "your" thoughts, from "my" point of view ;-) is not necessary--now I am not belittling your decision or anything---really hoping to encourage you to stay :-) I know we do show some "personal" traits in our posts, but for the most part it is still just words on a screen from "out there"...I'm not saying that I have no feelings about you guys, but they too are just sorta out there as I do not have an image to "attach" them to...

I enjoy being a part of your wonderings and learning and radiance, Geoff, in this somewhat limited way!

Great enjoyment in whatever "you" decide...Cathy


On Saturday, October 7, 2000, DaveR (The real one)@209.86.49.222 said:
Please note the IP address on this post. Compare it with the one a couple of posts down. Draw your own conclusions.

Hi, Geoff. Best of luck in your ventures.

Anonymous "DaveR", thanks, but no thanks. I speak just for myself. Others who can operate their keyboards are their own narrators and certainly don't need my help.


On Saturday, October 7, 2000, Geoff ()@203.12.152.23 said:
Hi Dave.

On Saturday, October 7, 2000, DaveR ()@216.34.244.105 said:
By the way, I just appointed myself the position of official forum narrator, speaking on everyone's behalf.

On Saturday, October 7, 2000, Geoff (one last thing ...)@203.12.152.23 said:
Warning. Large post ahead. Proceed with caution.

Firstly, we all know that addictions can be tough to break. If i ever return again can you please abuse me and tell me I'm crazy (or tell me something I don't know) ... trouble is I'm now not taking anything personally (perhaprs the single greatest piece of advice ever given - if you really think about it - or even if you judt do it :) so even insults might not be enough to break my addiction ... I need help. Does anyone want to start up a Chopra Forum Addicts group? we could meet once a week via the internet and share our experiences ... oh I am wicked aren't I ... :)

So, here are a few more passing thoughts which may or may not be related to recent discussions and which may or may not be of any interest or use to you personally as the case may be.

I am continuing to conduct unauthorised experiments and explorations into into the nature of my (there's that word agian) consciousness. As yet, I have arrived at no frm conclusions. :)

This should surprise nobody. Then again, if it's not 'my' consciousness whose is it? Is consciousness something one can 'own' or possess? But I digress ...

'Love thy enemy' & 'Those who would attack us need our love the most' ... who among us is truly 'impartial'? Is it even possible? I mean it is dead easy to love the bright & the charming & the enlightened & the pleasant & the agreeable & the kind & the those with charisma. Why do most of us have to put in an 'extra effort' to love the abrasive, the confused, the lost, the obnoxious, the miserable, the intolerant? and if it requires 'effort' is t really 'love'? Does any of us really know what it is ... and if we think we know how do we know if we might be mistaken or deluding ourselves?

Anybody els got a headache?

If everything is as it should be how come I got so many questions? :)

We do seem to focus a lot of our attention and energy on whether we 'agree' or disagree' but ultimately what can any of us 'know' beyond a shadow of doubt?

I used to think it was wonderful when people would tell me that 'nobody loves you as much as your family'. Now I'm not so sure that's such a great thing ... unless we all expand the meaning of the word 'family'. Language shapes our consciousness in ways we are barely aware of ... and thus shapes our experiences. But where would we be without it ... we'd have to rely on telepathy or something ... and how would 'telepathy' work without language of some description ...

"True, or unconditional, love is unaware of the strange demands you impose on your relationships. Love is the same for all. Your attempts to reserve love for specific relationships and then withold it from others is the very thing that has blocked your vision of love's presence. Give as love gives - just as the sun that gives its light to all who ask, or the sparrow that sings not for the one who listens, but for the song itself."
- from Emissary of Light (click here)

What a sad commentary on society that anyone who walks around constantly radiating joy & unattached bliss would most likely be regarded as being 'on something' or out-of-his-or-her-mind.

'Enchantment is our natural state'
- Journey Into Healing by Deepak Chopra

'I have absolutely no trouble remaining perfectly at peace within myself ... just as long as people don't bug me!'
- Ghandi

'I feel that one should not limit one's explorations of consciousness to that which we call sanity'
- Al Gore

'Trickling. Trickling. Trickling. My mind is trickling toward me.'
- Anon

'I post whatever happens to pop into my head in the moment. I'm not attached to it. I reserve the right to change my mind without notice.'
- Anon II

Twenty-five years ogo, nobody would have thought it possible. But then a hundred years ago the idea of a place like this was similarly unimaginable. Things change.

I leave you with a little passage from a book I happened to pick up at the library the otter day. It's called The Light of Experience and you know when you pick up a book and you get that strange inexplicable tingling of anticipation (or is that just 'me'?) ... anyway, I open it up and this is what I read ...

"Often in life we find some excuse to do something we already want to do. So I decided to walk round the world for peace and at the centre was this desire to experience the unity of the world and myself. Still looking for belongingness I wished no barriers. My teacher told me to walk without money. He said, 'Money is the greatest barrier between you and people. If you are tired, with money you will go to sleep in a hotel and eat in a restaurant and walk away. If you have no money you will be forced to find somebody who can give you food and shelter and to prove yourself a worthy guest - this way you will meet people.' ...

Now that is what I call 'walking the talk'. Who among us ...

The book is a collection of personal accounts from people like Colin Cowdrey, Maeve Binchy, et. al. about why they see things as they currentlysee things. The above passage comes from "Journey to the West" by Satish Kumar who was born in India in 1939 and became a wandering monk at age nine ... click here for a bit more 'info' ... I like the title of his autobiography No Destination :)

I may or may not decide to post future excerpts from this little book depending on whether you can behave yourselves enough to deserve a bed-time story. If you give me your addresses and the plane fare I can pop over and read them to you and tuck you in. :)

BTW, I'm not 'going' anywhere and most of my future posts will be transmitted telepathically through other 'members'. Or I may find my ego is too attached to this place to easily be detached ... :)

As for the 'reasons' for this strange move. Well, 'strange' is also a comparative term. Take the word 'normal' - try defining it without reference to other human beings. :) I think one of the best pieces of advice is to 'make no comparisons' ... if you really consider the full implications of that kind of mind-set ... some may say it's 'impractical' on a daily basis in the cut-and-thrust of 'life as we know it' ... but I wonder ... it makes me wonder ... and wonder is a wonderful state to be in ... :)

Somebody (apologies for not checking your name - but names are not all important) recently asked if Deepak walks his talk and lives absolutely in each moment ... who can say ... is it really possible as a three-dimensional physical being with a stomach to feed? ... hmmm ... what would a person's experience be if they touched each moment with their entire being ... who can say ...

FOOD4THOUGHT

Sayonara

See you all 'round'

"and on the third day he rose again ..."

J 

If you find any of this post remotely useful please send donations to:
Starving Poet, 21 King George Pde, Dandenong, Austraia, 3175.

Then consult a doctor. :)

Breathe ~ Let go ~ Smile

Namaste.


On Saturday, October 7, 2000, (K) (LOL)@156.56.122.189 said:
Favorite cowboy screen star: Pat Buttram

On Saturday, October 7, 2000, Peggy ()@209.86.50.131 said:
Not that I want to make anyone in particular the butt of a joke, can you answer the following? What/Who is Buttcrack's...

1. favorite song?
("Cheek to Cheek")

2. favorite comedienne?
(Fanny Brice)

3. favorite philosopher?
("Buttrand" Russell)

4. Favorite SNL moment?
(Dan Aykroyd as the refrigerator repairman)

5. Favorite vacation spot?
(Butte, Montana)

6. Favorite flowers?
(Asters and buttercups)

7. Favorite entree?
(rump roast)


On Saturday, October 7, 2000, Peggy ()@209.86.50.131 said:
{{{Carol!}}}

I marvel that something so beautiful as forgiveness can grow from something that was intended to cause discord and conflict.

Meanwhile, I entertain myself by pondering this: When the Buttcrack of Truth turns the other cheek, does he disappear altogether?


On Saturday, October 7, 2000, Peggy ()@209.86.50.131 said:
"Without being forgiven, released from the consequences of what we have done, our capacity to act would, as it were, be confined to a single deed from which we could never recover; we would remain the victims of its consequences forever, not unlike the sorcerer’s apprentice, who lacked the magic formula to break the spell."

-- Hannah Arendt


"If we could read the secret history of our enemies, we would find in each person's life sorrow and suffering enough to disarm all hostility."

-- Henry Wadsworth Longfellow


On Saturday, October 7, 2000, DaveR (Sleuthing)@209.86.54.38 said:
One of the ways these archives have come in handy for me is when I need a little pick-me-up. There are hundreds of posts, some of them spanning days and weeks, when there have been fun and games, sharing of amusing stories about our ups-and-downs, dealing with painful situations somebody was having to get through, comic relief, some really great links to other sites on the web where there are useful and educational works of many kinds, and what I have felt were genuine attempts to bridge those gaps that separate us as human beings.

It doesn't take a lot of effort to locate the darker sides most of us have shown. It does take a little charity to allow those weaknesses to exist in all of us and to see that the weaknesses haven't always prevented us from trying to be better people.

It all gets down to what you're looking for. Odds are that whatever that is, you'll find some examples of it here. Over four years and over 50,000 posts provide a real catalog of people trying to understand each other.


On Saturday, October 7, 2000, DaveR (Carol)@209.86.54.38 said:
Carol, that's how it appeared to me, too. Is that earth-shaking news? Am I missing something?

Anyone with the patience could surely find more juicy tidbits of conflict and name-calling. Why, there have even been periods when the forum wasn't even available. I found some instances of that just today.

I guess my point to all this is: what's it got to do with anything?


On Saturday, October 7, 2000, carol ()@38.37.124.34 said:
ok, it's my turn. let me see if i can see your point Mr, Ms, & or Mrs anonymous poster(s)

on 2/8/00 Hadi posted that he thought i had lied. and Kate and i had a disagreement, right?


On Saturday, October 7, 2000, truth ()@216.34.244.106 said:
On Tuesday, February 8, 2000, Hadi (Ch@rming.)@200.36.16.98 said:

Let's face it Carol, that is a lie and lying is very unspiritual. ...So, Carol, how is it that you can call yourself Spiritual when you act so selfishly? ... all that "acid" that's leaking out. It's been leaking a long time and it is not only hurting those it is poured on, but it is clearly eating away at your Soul.


On Saturday, October 7, 2000, truth ()@216.34.244.150 said:
On Tuesday, February 8, 2000, Carol ()@152.163.207.63 said:

Kate {Karen} - you have been spreading your *crap* around for months. good for me, that i have been silent!! and guess what, heres some more!

On Tuesday, February 8, 2000, Kate {Karen} (My, my)@129.79.144.74 said:

You do have belittling down to a fine art, don't you, Carol? ...Now, let's get real, Carol -- we can trade crap like that all day.


On Saturday, October 7, 2000, DaveR (Vega Lore)@209.86.51.229 said:
If you like reading about the origins and connections to folklore of star names, you might like a little further reading on VEGA at http://alfalira.com/Alfalira/vega-e.html.

Another article I read on the "Solar Apex" idea suggests that there are reasons to think that older theories of motion within The Galaxy are in the process of being updated. My own awareness of the "Sun's Way" concept dates from the 1960's. Much has changed since then. :-)


On Saturday, October 7, 2000, DaveR (Moving On)@209.86.51.229 said:
I couldn't resist the urge to find some words on the web to describe in a little more detail what I mentioned in my last post about the cycles/spirals notion. If you want to look further yourself, try a search at Yahoo! or Dogpile for "Apex of the Sun's Way" and check out some of the hits.

Here's an excerpt from one at "Star Gazer" (a PBS short weekly feature):

"Now although I shouldn't play favorites my favorite is the brightest, Vega, the 5th brightest star we can see from Earth. It glistens a crisp sharp blue white which tells us that it is a much, much hotter star than out own yellow-orange Sun. Indeed, compared to our Sun's surface temperature of 10,000 degrees fahrenheit, Vega burns a fierce 17,000 degrees. And whereas our sun is just a little under 1 million miles in diameter, Vega is almost 3 million miles wide. Indeed, if we could place our Sun and Vega side by side, Vega would be 60 times brighter. But the thing I really like to think about when I gaze up at Vega on these crisp autumn nights is that our Sun and all its planets, including our earth, are racing head on toward Vega at the incredible speed of 12 miles a second, that's over 43,000 miles per hour which means that every year we get almost 400 million miles closer. However even though Vega is only 27 light years away, nevertheless at this speed it would take our Sun almost half a billion years to reach it.

Astronomers call this point in space toward which we are rushing "The Apex of the Sun's Way". How lovely. How poetic. So some night this month, perhaps on one of the evenings of Indian Summer, go out just after sunset, look almost overhead, focus on Vega and if you have a vivid imagination, let your spirit soar and you might almost feel our tiny Earth hurtling through space toward this magnificent star, "The Apex of the Sun's Way". What a wonderful venture awaits you these autumn nights if you simply remember to Keep Looking Up!"


On Saturday, October 7, 2000, Cathy (catcta@aol.com)@64.12.104.23 said:
Hi Dave--I like that spiral idea! :-) So, in fact the forum is not at the same place exactly, it's moved up on the spiral :-)though it might "appear" to be the same old whatever... New players, new opportunities to learn (possibly the same or similar lesson)...thanks for that insight---I think I've heard it before, now that you mention it...Maybe we should write a new song...All my life's an Upward Spiral?? :-)

I had actually just come back to add that this too shall pass....to return later ;-) Ha! But, now I'll have to think about that....

Thanks! Cathy


On Saturday, October 7, 2000, DaveR (Cycles)@209.86.49.89 said:
Cathy and anonymous poster, one fun thing I've come to understand about cycles might be worth keeping in mind.

Astronomers tell us that the Sun, along with the planets, is moving around the center of our Milky Way Galaxy in a long trip that takes thousands (maybe millions?) of years to complete. And the galaxy itself is moving among other galaxies. They can even point to a place in the sky that indicates where are moving TO and where we are moving FROM.

What this really means to me is that we don't go around in the same circle as the years pass. Instead we're moving in a spiral or helix like a Slinky. As we get back to that same point in the earth's orbit where we were last year, that place has moved! So we never get back to that exact same place.

As Wolfe said, "You can't go home again." Or as an old proverb says, "You can always go back, but you can never return."

Maybe those cycles just feel like we're getting back to same-old-same-old, when in fact we're just being provided with a new way of going through the same (or similar) moves.

However you interpret these facts, as further evidence of reincarnation, as support for the deja vu' concepts, or just as seeing things as slightly different in the way the world looks this October, it can be another tidbit to factor into our thinking.


On Saturday, October 7, 2000, Cathy (catcta@aol.com)@64.12.104.151 said:
Was in a rush...also wanted to mention regarding Dave's comment that the forum was much the same last year...maybe this is simply a refelction of what I'm seeing as my circular spiritual life? :-) The times when conflicts appear are when there are two or more people who are "forgetting" some of what they know as far as egos and arguing etc...then too, there are newcomers, like myself who cause trouble by talking "too much" ;-) From what I've seen over the months I've been here, a lot of wisdom is here, it just gets clouded in "personal" agendas sometimes....and that's understandable as we by and large still view ourselves as persons with ideas to share (or that "must" be understood--I'm pointing at myself ;-)

Take heart, Dave...this too shall pass :-)

Cathy


On Saturday, October 7, 2000, Cathy (catcta@aol.com)@64.12.104.52 said:
What strange posts...referring to those from Feb/2000...I don't understand the reason for posting them...if you're trying to "prove" that Peggy should leave, it's not working--for me at least :-) I haven't been privey to all the conflicts of days gone by, but I know there are always two sides, and usually it's just a matter of misunderstanding. And maybe a dash of different personaloties :-)

I don't think anyone "makes" anyone else do anything--at least in the context of this forum...from what Geoff said, I don't think he was in the least mad or upset about anything. He just didn't want to be attached to "his" thoughts which he felt posting here was doing?? Hadi was mad, yes, but I'm afraid that I sorta started that one--and I've apologized...what more can one do?

gotta go! Cathy


On Saturday, October 7, 2000, DaveR (Carol)@209.86.49.89 said:
Carol, thanks for the comments about the haiku. That one is a favorite of mine, and is a great example of how much can be said with a few words.

I haven't written any for a long time now. But that specific haiku by Buson might be an inspiration to try to get back to them.

I appreciate your frankness in your recent posts, and it looks as if you're able to see that by having things in archives we're all needing a little humility in that bygones may not necessarily be bygones. As we try to learn from each other here, and elsewhere, we need to remember where we've been and the things we've said before. Many of those past issues are over and done with. Many new ones face us now. Are we still the same people?

I was searching through the archives just the other day, trying to see where we were a year ago, two years ago, etc. It is sobering to see how little things do change here. But we won't get any better at those things unless we try.

Carol, thanks for the welcome back, and I hope any hard feelings that still remain between you and me can be put to rest.


On Saturday, October 7, 2000, Karen (Carol)@156.56.122.169 said:
Big :-)

On Saturday, October 7, 2000, carol (mcwieg@juno.com)@63.28.26.88 said:
well, first let me respond to Bob's query about some truth in all posts, i was not speaking of the content of anyone's particular post here. i was simply stating that the anonymous poster (s) have been posting, using my name, without any input from me, whatsoever. i have not asked for anyone to post on my behalf.

and the post where i said i was not discussing these issues here with Peggy was at a time that the anonymous postings gave her every right to feel that i was behind or part of all that was being said. if we could have spoke offline, one on one, we could have cleared this up easily, but due to the tone of the anonymous postings she had every right to feel that she might not be able to trust my motives. i had posted a couple of times that i wasn't involved but too much damage had been done, imo. now it seems she might be a little more open to me, so therefore unknown to the poster that posted the other day, Peggy and i had spoke, together, and it seems we might be able accept healing, now. correct me, Peggy, if i am wrong. i must say that we haven't always agreed and probably there will be other issues that we don't necessarily agree with but i have always been able to talk to Peggy, one on one, and we have always walked away from these discussions feeling better. personally, i don't feel that i have to say anything here about anything but Bob's post did seem to open a door for me and i decided to walk thru it.

as for Geoff and Hadi taking a break from the Forum, so be it, if they so desire but to lay it on Peggy, seems to have no truth in it for me. they are big boys and can decide for themselves. personally, i hope they continue to post here, i love them both, but i will understand if they need to take a break.

as for me, i will come in when i feel like it and post when i feel like it or not.

love to all, even the anonymous posters, and Namasté


On Saturday, October 7, 2000, ( | ) ( | )@216.34.244.105 said:
you screwed up a font tag, sheesh.


On Saturday, October 7, 2000, Sheesh (Talk about Cycles)@216.34.244.49 said:
And talk about nit-picking, if there's ever a lice epidemic, you could make a lot of money. Looks like someone's a little anal here, at least Peggy's trying to learn and grow.

On Saturday, October 7, 2000, ( | ) ( | )@216.34.244.103 said:
On Monday, February 7, 2000, Peggy ()@207.223.182.1 said:

Carol, if I thought that the forum would be better because of my absence from it, I would be willing to go away from it altogether. That's how much I care about the forum.

SHOW US YOU CARE!!
this forum was fine until you returned

first Hadi, now Geoff. Bob next? show you care, please!


On Saturday, October 7, 2000, Not Who Many Might Think At First Glance (Syncronicity)@216.34.244.18 said:
What a coincidence Cathy. As this forum just seems to repeat cycles, I almost posted this song the other day:

All my life's a circle;
Sunrise and sundown;
Moon rolls thru the nighttime;
Till the daybreak comes around.

All my life's a circle;
But I can't tell you why;
Season's spinning round again;
The years keep rollin' by.

It seems like I've been here before;
I can't remember when;
But I have this funny feeling;
That we'll all be together again.
No straight lines make up my life;
And all my roads have bends;
There's no clear-cut beginnings;
And so far no dead-ends.

All my life's a circle;
Sunrise and sundown;
Moon rolls thru the nighttime;
Till the daybreak comes around.

All my life's a circle;
But I can't tell you why;
Season's spinning round again;
The years keep rollin' by.

I found you a thousand times;
I guess you done the same;
But then we lose each other;
It's like a children's game;

As I find you here again;
A thought runs through my mind;
Our love is like a circle;
Let's go 'round one more time.

All my life's a circle;
Sunrise and sundown;
Moon rolls thru the nighttime;
Till the daybreak comes around.

All my life's a circle;
But I can't tell you why;
Season's spinning round again;
The years keep rollin' by.


On Saturday, October 7, 2000, truth ()@216.34.244.105 said:
On Monday, February 7, 2000, Peggy ()@207.223.182.1 said:

I don't want to discuss anything with you. There is nothing to discuss. I do not trust you. I'm not mad at you. I just don't like you.

When I live with more grace in my life, then maybe I will be a more patient and forgiving person. But life is too short to spend it with people that I cannot respect.

So there will be no discussion between you and me ...

On Thursday, February 10, 2000, Peggy ()@207.223.182.179 said:

Carol, if you don't want to respond to my questions, you might try not saying anything addressed to me. It gets the point across better. Just a suggestion.

On Thursday, February 10, 2000, Carol (NEVNO96@aol.com)@152.163.207.48 said:

"... i prefer to have no discussion with you here."


On Friday, October 6, 2000, DaveR (Geoff)@209.86.54.44 said:
Geoff, if it could serve as some relief from your concern about the rogue post, I can assure you that there have been instances when two people posted at the same instant and somehow the posts became "fused" when they made it through Random House's software. It happened to me once or twice and I know of other instances where it happened to others.

It is unfortunate that the specific posts that merged in your case may have distorted the message you intended, but it shouldn't be interpreted (as I see it) as anything other than a freak event.

If the outcome of that post, and the reactions to it, have caused you to question your worth here, please accept the oddity as a gift, and not a curse.

If your needs are for some time for reflection or recharging your batteries, that's easy to understand. But don't allow a once-in-a-blue-moon thing to rattle you.

Best wishes in any case!


On Friday, October 6, 2000, Cathy (catcta@aol.com)@64.12.104.176 said:
I love walking the dog! :-) Tonight it was beautiful out, and I enjoyed some "quiet" time--away from the kids :-)

Anyone ever heard the song, "All my Life's a Circle?" by Harry Chapin? It was running through my mind as I was outside, and it occurred to me that the circle analogy is a great one on several levels...obviously the cycle of days is circular, then the circle of life thing (most recently in Disney's Lion King :-)) about "food chains"--birth/death/birth (I'm thinking about Nature more, but reincarnation fits too :-)) Then the waht goes around comes around idea...

But the most useful analogy for me right now was how this applies to spiritual understanding and growth. Polly Berends says, for most of us, awakening is not something we do all at once, but over and over again until death. And this fits how I seem to be going along...I have good moments and not so good moments--and good ones again--different points on the circle :-)

And then the day will come when we erase the circle (and our little dot/self )...

Zen Buddhists tell of a student who could not speak Japanese. Therefore, instead of speaking with him, his master gave him a drawing to meditate on to help enlighten him regarding the truth of being. The drawing was a simple circle with a dot in the center. After a long time the student brought the drawing back to the master to demonstrate his understanding. He had erased the circle. The master indicated that while this was a fine beginning, it was not suffcient. So the student went away--again for a long time. This time when he had returned, he had erased the dot. He was enlightened. The dot stood for the self. The circle for others. He had discovered that there was only one mind--one self.

Neat story, I think...

Peace! Cathy


On Friday, October 6, 2000, Peggy ()@209.86.54.44 said:
Geoff, you are one of the consistently bright spots here. Please reconsider! You are needed!

On Friday, October 6, 2000, Cathy (catcta@aol.com)@64.12.104.176 said:
Geoff

Don't go! :-) They don't have to be "your" thoughts you post, but thoughts of God transmitted through you, you just being the conduit?? Worth a try ;-) I, for one, will miss "you" much!

Ciao!


On Friday, October 6, 2000, Cathy (catcta@aol.com)@64.12.104.176 said:
This is from another list I'm on...I thought it was good...just sharing...take it or leave it :-)

I am always curious when we speak in altogether "certain" terms about the nature of reality. It seems to me that the best that we each have is a mental-spiritual model for reality, and since we use words of limitation whenever we describe anything, certainly NDW did in his writing, how we could take up the practice of dissecting, interpreting and justifying our personal views,studying the words that Walsch has written as MORE than information to test out for the model we are building for ourselves, this I find very curious. Determinists have argued and believed throughout human history that our fate is already decided. Then they have to fit our "free will" into that model and much of religious expression has come from the variety of descriptions and uses we have supported or disclaimed as a race. Determinism has led to a great deal of "my way or the highway" being expressed under the guise of spiritual or religious expression. Metaphysicians have believed that we have a say in how it goes. This is just about as ancient a school as any. How long must it have taken before we began to realize that there was a connection between what we say and believe and the way we experienced our lives? Not so very long I imagine. It seems that it would have been the first step away from fear to notice that words spoken in love and with the belief in what is good actually produced good results and words spoken with fear and belief in the erroneously accepted grounds for the fear resulted in nasty results. There has been some controversy about how much say we have, i.e., Mike Nolley's statement about the relative inevitability of the eventual "happy ending" is a product of this mix. (This does not address the beginninglessness of reality or that there may be no grounds for believing in endings, since both are essential unprovable ideas when applied to ultimate reality. Beginnings and endings are a product of our faith in the idea of time, which merely is a measure of our experience and nothing more.) Mystics have believed that "it" or everything is all God anyway, and each of them has said a variety of things to describe "the material" and what is actually "real" or God. There is the idea that we remember who we are or return to the source of our being: "God" or one of the thousands of other ways we have referred to ultimate reality. Some say what we experience as material things is an illusion, some say the material is as "real" as we need it to be for our spiritual development. None of us really knows the "final answer" as far as I can tell, but I am a work in progress and if I discover for myself something more than that, I will be sure to let everyone I can know about what "it" is. When we express our "opinions" and describe our model for "reality," for me, it seems most respectful to speak in terms of our own ideas rather than positing the truth for others. Simply on the basis of our individual experience and interest, we will discover different portions of ultimate reality. This doesn't make it "my truth" or "your truth" but simply a means to express respect for one anothers views and experience. Incidentally, I think "fate" is that which occurs when I do not consciously choose for myself what I would think, say, feel, or do. Then something about collective consciousness supplies that which I have not bothered to consider and it can only be as good as the level of thinking that represents all of existence. Our conscious, mindful living elevates this collective consciousness and our unconconsciousness supports a mirrored effect in the collective consciousness. We are either choosing to live consciously or unconsciously choosing to allow the general idea of the whole of humanity to choose for us. Either is a choice and it is ours to make. This idea elemental to the idea of conscious co-creation. I love this group! God blesses us always and in all ways, Love, Susanne "It is our duty - as men and women - to behave as though limits to our ability do not exist. We are co-creators of the Universe." Teilhard de Chardin Please visit these web sites: http://go.to/EmersonCenter http://go.to/EmersonOnlineStudies http://go.to/RevSusanne


On Friday, October 6, 2000, Peggy ()@209.86.54.44 said:
In my opinion, here is a statement that has no element of truth in it:

All statements are always false.

If you are wanting an esoteric discussion, I'm not your girl.

But if you would like to discuss a post that Buttcrack made, that would be a little more relevant and practical. (The name has be changed to protect the innocent.)

"ummm Peg musta forgot {Patrick} wasn't speaking to her. or maybe she's baiting {him} again? It's one thing to be arrogant and consciously try to correct it. It's quite another to repeatedly remind (and demonstrate to) others how proud you are of your own arrogance."

It is true that I don't recall a time when Patrick and I were not speaking to each other. But the truth is most likely that there was never a time when Patrick and I weren't on speaking terms.

To say that I may be baiting Patrick again implies that I baited him at some earlier time. So I will plead guilty and get that out of the way.

When Buttcrack uses the word "maybe," that also leaves open the possibility of "maybe not." So that statement is not false and contains some element of truth by its implication.

If we apply Heisenberg's Principle (which I am not familiar with), just because I have baited Patrick in the past does not mean that I will bait him at other times. (I hope that I have not distorted the principle.)

Buttcrack seems to be operating on false logic. Consider this syllogism:

(1)Peggy has baited Patrick in statements in the past.

(2) Peggy is making statments about Patrick again.

(3) Therefore, Peggy is baiting Patrick again.


The first two statements are true, but the conclusion is false.

Further, I am the only one in a position to know my motives in posting about Patrick. The truth is that I was not baiting Patrick. So the implication of Buttcrack's statement was erroneous.

As far as I can tell, the rest of that particular Buttcrack post is true. The only exception that I would take is if he were implying that I am proud of my arrogance. Such an implication would be wrong. And to infer that it is true would be a mistake.


On Friday, October 6, 2000, Goeff ()@203.12.152.23 said:
I have seen the light.

I now realise that the Forum is an addiction holding me back from greater awareness. By posting 'my' thoughts I have unknowingly been identifying with them. I will now take Deepak's tip to heart and cling to nothing as being 'me' or 'mine'.

Anyone out there want to by my television? or my CD player ... how about my house ... of course if I take this too far you'll have no way to contact 'me'.

Au Revoir.


On Friday, October 6, 2000, Geoff (Bob)@203.12.152.23 said:
Well, Bob, even the word 'expert' is a comparative one. :)

In reply to your further question about how 'he not so gracious input to Peggy had to come from somewhere so how did it end up in your post?' (BTW, not to be pedantic, but even the word 'gracious' is an interpretation imposed onto someone's action or nonaction :)

Anyway, I am as flummoxed as anyone. :) I have never accidentally (though they say NOTHNG is ever truly an 'accident') typed a single apostrophe so obviously I now know it can yield unexpected results.

Just outta cusiosity I might try it again sometime. :)

So, if you see a 'rogue' post it will have that symbol which looks like the greek letter omega. It appears in the top line of each post after the date and the person's name.

Love the quotes, Anne.

"I get a strange thrill everytime I visit the Forum. I recommend it to everyone I meet." - Albert Einstein


On Friday, October 6, 2000, Bob F ()@165.121.48.250 said:
Peggy - Why don't you pick a few statements that you believe don't have any truth in them and we will see where it goes.

However, keep in mind Heisenberg's Principle - for example - just because gravity has always caused things to fall toward earth in the past does not guarantee they will fall to the earth the next time.

Namaste'


On Friday, October 6, 2000, ( | ) ( | )@216.34.244.19 said:
nitpick

On Friday, October 6, 2000, Peggy ()@209.86.55.77 said:
" I believe everyone of us is a Saint and a Sinner. The worst others have ever done, we have probably done as well in one lifetime or another. Also, the best of others we have also probably duplicated in one of our many lifetimes."

I might have chosen different words but I agree with you strongly on the basic premise that there is good in all of us and corruptness in all of us. I also think that all of us judge, even when we believe that judgment is wrong.

But I can think of a lot of statements that have no truth in them.


On Friday, October 6, 2000, Bob F ()@165.121.48.26 said:
Peggy - I might add that whatever the case, I do not congratulate my self or chastize myself - It just is, it is as it should be and it is as I have manifested it!

Namaste' again


On Friday, October 6, 2000, Bob F ()@165.121.48.26 said:
Peggy - Yes, I do believe their is an element of truth in everything. It is the old duality thing.

If someone views me as being wrong or having done something bad, if I look close enough and without my ego in the way, I can see they are partially (or totally) right. The same goes if someone thinks I am right or have done something good.

I believe everyone of us is a Saint and a Sinner. The worst others have ever done, we have probably done as well in one lifetime or another. Also, the best of others we have also probably duplicated in one of our many lifetimes.

Consequently, whatever anyone has to say about me, probably has an element of truth in it.

Namaste'


On Friday, October 6, 2000, Irobela (iwreagh@co.honolulu.hi.us)@204.182.234.218 said:
In The Seven Spriitual Laws of Success Deepok speaks of total and complete acceptance of every moment. Is this humanly possible? Is Deepok walking the talk? and if so, HOW?

On Friday, October 6, 2000, carol ()@38.37.124.97 said:
hi Peggy - hey, thanks for the hugs and right back atcha! :) and yes, i am still pleased and as each project is completed i feel closer to my center, more blissful. but wow! life has really been sort of exciting lately, and not very predictable, heh!

On Friday, October 6, 2000, carol ()@38.37.124.97 said:
actually, Bob - the posts were not to me, they just had my name in them and no, there was no truth in it as far as anyone being asked to speak for me or in my name. i did not ask for it and certainly did not advocate it. it is only now that i felt that a door was opened( via your post) that i felt i could say anything concerning this, for that, i thank you very much.

On Friday, October 6, 2000, Peggy ()@209.86.49.130 said:
Bob F, just saw your more recent comments. Do you believe there is an element of truth in everything? If so, can you explain further?

On Friday, October 6, 2000, Peggy ()@209.86.49.130 said:
Carol: Hello and hugs too! I hope that the recent changes that you have made continue to be pleasing to you. Are you doing well? You seem to be very centered.

Chris, I got distracted and forgot to let you know that I am sorry to hear about your grandmother. You must be such a comfort to her.

Bob F., I respect you for not needing to use the anonymizer to speak your truth. I think that the anonymizer is being used for more than one purpose. Some of the posts are as you described (honest feedback without pulling any punches.) An example would be the post from "Why." She or he was afraid that I would retaliate. While it might be hoped in the long run that these posters will lose some of their fears, their posts still serve a good purpose.

There are others who use the anonymizer in hope that the person for whom the message was intended will get the point when the filter of individual personalities is not involved.

These are the two kinds of anonymous posts that are thought provoking for me.

Still others use the anonymizer to tease or make inside jokes. They aren't meant to hurt anyone and they seem basically harmless to me.

Finally, some use the anonymizer to throw punches without the honesty that you spoke of. I think that it may have been these posts that used Carol's name in a way that was hurtful to her.

You said: "...we often watch what we say to keep from hurting other people's feelings and therefore, at times they are not completely honest."

It is my opinion that if a person is going to be hurt by another person's words, then it doesn't matter whether or not the anonymizer is used. The words hurt them anyway. ("A rose by any other name...") So the use of the anonymizer creates a delusion for the poster: I can say this and still be a nice (non-judging, spiritual, enlightened, etc.) person.

I look forward to a time when we can all be honest in our comments and open to the opinions of others without feeling hurt -- even if we don't agree.


On Friday, October 6, 2000, Bob F ()@165.121.53.2 said:
TO - Thanks but no need to worry about credit - "meditate, meditate, meditate" or "practice, practice, practice" - the message is basically the same. Same "wave" length, same "frequency".

Carol - Love you as always and both of you are welcomed whenever in glorious NM. Now to the anonymous postings. I do not know what the content of the messages to you were, but is there not an element of truth in everything? Was not there a part of you that reflected and said "maybe"? Our view of the world and ourselves is often (always?) illusion and therefore can often be delusion as well. What do you think???

Namaste'


On Friday, October 6, 2000, charles holsopple (charles@word-o-mouth.org)@206.228.168.2 said:
I feel as if these writings are to some degree a biography of my life. I don't pretend to have the disipline or education to live according to all the teachings or even understand every one, but my intent is and always has been on parralel with most all that I have read. thank you and I hope to be involved with the sharing and proliferation of this awarness and love. charles

On Friday, October 6, 2000, carol ()@38.37.124.53 said:
hi Bob - i hope you know i have a lot of respect for you and i enjoy your posts very much, keep it up. i do want to tell you, tho, that many of the anonymous posts have had my name in them and much of what was said was not true. sooooooooooo, as to would say....... well, i think i made my point but if not i could be much clearer, if you deem it necessary. Namasté, dear friend and i am still looking forward to visiting you in NM, soon, i hope.

On Friday, October 6, 2000, to (@)@216.236.6.218 said:
1,000,000 down to 800,000...............

20% reduction in teenage pregnancies.

The numbers shown are hypothetical. Good ole statistics.............ha.


On Friday, October 6, 2000, to (@)@216.236.6.81 said:
Namaste'

Just want to give credit where credit is due.

I think that it was Bob F who originated the "meditate, meditate, meditate".

My saying is "practice, practice, practice".


On Friday, October 6, 2000, charles (charles@word-o-mouth.org)@206.228.168.2 said:
as is with much of my life i wrote the previous post without knowledge of the nature or even existance of this being a message board. my comments were on the writings of deepak chopra in the seven spitiual laws of success.

On Friday, October 6, 2000, charles holsopple (charles@word-o-mouth.org)@206.228.168.2 said:
I feel as if these writings are to some degree a biography of my life. I don't pretend to have the disipline or education to live according to all the teachings or even understand every one, but my intent is and always has been on parralel with most all that I have read. thank you and I hope to be involved with the sharing and proliferation of this awarness and love. charles

On Friday, October 6, 2000, Bob F ()@165.121.48.161 said:
Again, food for thought,

I have not posted anonomously nor will I.

However, the anonomous posts do give us honest feedback without any punches being witheld. In straight forward posts, we often watch what we say to keep from hurting other people's feelings and therefore, at times they are not completely honest.

For what it is worth, I say anonomous posters - continue on - I may learn more there than elsewhere.

Namaste'


On Friday, October 6, 2000, carol ()@38.37.124.156 said:
hi again Silvia! remember a few posts back, i posted hello, hello, hello! that was to you and Peggy i assumed you would guess it was to you because you were coming back from a little stay away. but in case you didn't here it is again.

Hello, Hello, Hello! :)


On Friday, October 6, 2000, Silvia (S@W)@24.113.35.216 said:
Do you ever read a post and think about it, then mentally respond and believe that the other person has received your thoughts? I do that...alot. Then I realize that they probably didn't hear me, so I just wanted to say hello to everyone and Chris that's very special of you to care for your grandmother at this time.

On Friday, October 6, 2000, ( | ) ( / ) ( | ) ( \ ) ( | )@216.34.244.105 said:
lotsa mirrors.

dancing mirrors


On Friday, October 6, 2000, Chris V. (cvedeler@ix.netcom.com)@192.56.191.140 said:
No problem Peggy, it happens to me all the time. By the way, as you know from dialogs of Forum lore, I'm not particularly fond of the word "enlightenment". Not because I don't believe that people can achieve such a state of awareness, but because it is more often used as a divisive word to separate the spiritual "elite" from the spiritual "hum-drum". I believe that anyone that has truly experienced such a state of awareness doesn't have much interest anymore in making such distinctions as they see the divine in everything and everyone. As TO quoted earlier "Make the smallest distinction however and heaven and earth are set infinitely apart." Your balcony experience, whether 2 minutes or 2 years gives you an anchor point for your spiritual voyage and thus is of great value.

On Friday, October 6, 2000, ( | ) ( | )@216.34.244.150 said:
my friends call me buttcrack, you can call me mirror

On Friday, October 6, 2000, Peggy ()@209.86.51.130 said:
That reminds me...

(|), how do you pronounce your name? Is it Buttcrack?

Merriment and light...


On Friday, October 6, 2000, Peggy ()@209.86.51.130 said:
{{{TO}}}, sometimes you say exactly the right thing at the right time.

And I'm not even gonna tell you what it was.


On Friday, October 6, 2000, Peggy ()@209.86.51.130 said:
Okay (|), you caught me! I was already posting silently twenty times a day and offering to post silently only seven times was a trick. Can't get one over on you!


On Thursday, October 5, 2000, Peggy ()@209.86.51.130 said:
Chris,

I was in the midst of giving some positive feedback to you when a mysterious html trick brought in those words from the Great Cyber Cosmos.

Actually, I reread your post and you weren't saying what I at first thought you were saying.

Sorry!


On Thursday, October 5, 2000, Cathy (catcta@aol.com)@64.12.104.33 said:
Good stuff guys :-)

Muchas gracias!

Cathy...still smiling :-)


On Thursday, October 5, 2000, ( | ) ( | )@216.34.244.105 said:
sounds like an addiction

trust you? you already lied! why seven, why not seventeen, or seventy.


On Thursday, October 5, 2000, Peggy ()@209.86.51.130 said:
So maybe the Earth is flat and the sun revolves this surface. Sure looks that way to me! :-)

Maybe I'm misunderstanding you, Chris. Would you mind trying again to explain. Why the generalization about scientists?

What bothered you most about Sagan? Was it his advocacy of an open mind or his plea to look at the evidence in matters of science?


On Thursday, October 5, 2000, Peggy (Geoff)@209.86.51.130 said:
A likely story, young man! (sniff)

I would have known that you didn't write that even if you hadn't told me. Your understanding of "time" is not so limited.

But if you, for whatever reason, had posted that comment, then I would have taken that as a sure sign that I should think about it. I respect you in that way.

Still haven't figured out what the rules are for a silent forum...But, okay, I will give it a shot:

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

There. That was great! From now on every day, for every post that I make, I will be silent for seven others. I won't even post my name or a date or those blank lines. You'll just have to trust me on this. If I click on The Meaning of Life, will I get some comic relief from Monty Python? :-D


On Thursday, October 5, 2000, Chris V. (cvedeler@ix.netcom.com)@63.50.229.198 said:
Carol Thank you for your thoughts and prayers for my grandmother. She is doing better, but still has a ways to go out of the woods.

Geoff "For those of you who are wondering ... yes, i realise that substantial chunks of this message are ego-driven ... I simply observe the fact and make no judgement about it ..." Now I realize that I'm being judgmental here, but I think this is great stuff! There is tremendous wisdom in recognizing the ego in the light of non-judgment and letting go of the ego's attachment even though we continue to operate within the ego's world. Stuff of masters me thinks.
I also loved, "Tread everything you encounter as a dream." It reminds me of "A Course in Miracles". I'm glad I'm on the same playground as all of you here.

Dave Thanks for the Carl Sagan link. I've enjoyed Sagans work since the "Cosmos" series back in the early 80's. I read "A Demon Haunted World" a few years ago, just as I was really starting to explore spirituality more. Science, spirituality and mystism are all really the same stuff when you get right down to it I think. Objectivity is an illusion, and so they are all dealing with a subjective testing of experience, looking for patterns, seeking a unifying experience of the whole. I'm not talking about the institution of science, which is largely driven by egos, money and power, but the pure science of systematically checking things out without attachment to the intellectual constructs that come along in a personal exploration of the cosmos.

Peace and light to all.


On Thursday, October 5, 2000, Ahem (Um)@216.34.244.150 said:
That was in refrence to last night's post, not the discovery that Geoff made.

On Thursday, October 5, 2000, Ahem ()@216.34.244.19 said:
Another thing I've learned here. You can't post a link here through the anonymizer. For some reason it puts a Random House tag in front.

On Thursday, October 5, 2000, Bob F ()@165.121.48.172 said:
Geoff - Thanks for clarifying - it didn't sound like your kind of post. By firing things up, I meant "stirring the pot".

You are the computer expert and understand all this link business and fancy posting (compliment), so please explain in language we commoners can understand. The not so gracious input to Peggy had to come from somewhere so how did it end up in your post?

If you tell me it was floating in cyberspace and just dropped in or cyberspace created it to begin with, I am going to start taking this Forum a lot more seriously than I have in the past.

Namaste'


On Thursday, October 5, 2000, Anne ()@203.30.210.27 said:
In the beginning, God had a thought
then he had another thought
and then there was light
what a wonderful site

:)


On Thursday, October 5, 2000, Anne (All)@203.30.210.27 said:
'The Chopra Forum is the greatest thing since sliced bread."
- Socrates

"Whenever I'm feeling a bit sad or lonely or despondent, I simply log onto the Chopra Forum and it always brings a smile to my face."
- Richard Nixon

Personally, I love this place and I reckon whenever we lose our sense of humour we have lost our way (temporarily).

Cheers.

Geoff, keep it up.


On Thursday, October 5, 2000, Geoff (HTML)@203.12.152.23 said:
Ah yes, note to all interested parties - when posting a LINK, remember the web address has to be encased between double apostrophes. In my 'rogue' posting below, I used a single apostrophe. You learn something every day. :)

On Thursday, October 5, 2000, Geoff (Daniel)@203.12.152.23 said:
Greetings and salutations, Daniel,

Funny you should mention poems ... I went shopping in between those last 2 or 3 or 4 posts ... and this just 'popped' into my head as i strolled arounf the market ...

The truth may not be spoken
Even when you have awoken
The record is not broken
My God, that man is chokin'

Namaste


On Thursday, October 5, 2000, Geoff (ooops :)@203.12.152.23 said:
Well, that'll teach me. In future, click 'Preview'.

Peggy, when you get to the message that is five below THIS one - I have no idea how the reply to your balcony story got pasted INTO my post. That is an absolute first - I must've typed in some 'rogue' HTML code when in fact I was actually trying to post a link. :)

A link to, of all things, the Meaning of Life

Bob, I hope that answers your enquiry too. If not, you may need to be more specific as to 'firing' things up. I would hope nobody here takes any post personally. All I do is 'use' what I can and 'discard' the rest. Though even the stuff I 'discard' can be an excellent reminder of where others are 'at'

Namaste.

J

On Thursday, October 5, 2000, carol ()@38.37.124.50 said:
hey Dave - nice to see you posting again. i saw this stunning haiku the other day and thought of you......

I leave,
you stay --
two autumns.

Buson


On Thursday, October 5, 2000, Daniel (dano@bigfoot.com)@192.149.148.6 said:

Geoff -

I often wonder what indellible affect is made by reading or hearing or seeing something -- no matter how fully we "grok" it. I have heard music, seen beauty, and read books, that have moved me to heaven's gate, but it is transient, like a drug. Perhaps the inward flow of knowledge from our senses has the potential to enlighten us, but it is our addiction to judgement that strips those experiences of that pure soma juice. In any event, all glory to the poets among us, of which you are one. May we once and for all milk that juice from well spoken words.

Daniel


On Thursday, October 5, 2000, Bob F (Geoff)@165.121.48.245 said:
Geoff - What are you doing? Are you trying to fire things up or to calm them down?

Namaste'


On Thursday, October 5, 2000, DaveR (Useful Reading)@209.86.49.154 said:
Just recently, while reading Carl Sagan's A DEMON-HAUNTED WORLD, this section of his book (A Baloney Detection Kit) was most enlightening and useful to keep in mind.

Forum readers might enjoy it.


On Thursday, October 5, 2000, Geoff ()@203.12.152.23 said:
Just one 'final' thought ... ummm ... it's an Internet Forum ... a few ords on the screen ... were you expecting to find the ()@216.34.244.49 said:
Pegasus

For an individual whose closest experience to Enlightenment was a 2 minute affair on a balcony, you would be better off typing less and listening more. Wasn't there a quote along the lines of those who speak don't know? Oh yes, you took exception with that as well.


On Thursday, October 5, 2000, Geoff (Cathy)@203.12.152.23 said:
Cathy,

Yes, it's a tricky one, isn't it! If you even point out to another human being that they are 'making judgements' then you yourself could be said engaging in the action of making a 'judgement' about what they 'should' or 'should not' be doing. As TO says, if you really took this wisdom absolutely seriously you probably would remain silent ... :) (Note: by 'you' I mean 'anyone' ... if that makes any sense :)


On Thursday, October 5, 2000, Geoff (typos)@203.12.152.23 said:
Pardon the typos in the 'passing thoughts - nobody's perfect - that's waht makes this existence so interesting

On Thursday, October 5, 2000, Geoff ()@203.12.152.23 said:

On Thursday, October 5, 2000, Geoff (Passing thoughts)@203.12.152.23 said:
Passing Thoughts

Good Morning All,

I composed this message off-line as one can neve be quite sure what may have occured 'overnight' at this place inbetween visits. :)

Anyway, having read the forum yesterday, I went on a long walk around Dandenong on a glorious Melbourne spring day. Here are a couple of the passing thoughts I decided to scribble down as I walked along ...

Make of them what-you-will. Some of you may care to make a silk purse out of them. As always, the choice is yours. :)

[  I welcome this 'disruption' to the normal flow of the Forum. I embrace it. We all need a shake-up now and then. To even call it a 'disruption' is to form a judgement about it ... :)

[  Yes, you're quite right - there are many paradoxes about the human experience ... for instance, I love the idea from Starbuilders that instead of bieng troubled by the paradoxes or trying to 'figure it out' intellectually we would be well advised to just SURF the paradox ...

[  And it is useful from time-to-time to remind our selves (we do seem to be terribly forgetful creatures) of all the 'stuff' we need to let go if we want to get 'anywhere' - blame - judgements - opinions - identity - comparisons - expectations - ther may be more to add to this list but I'd say most negative human experiences (and yes, even calling an experience 'negative' ... argh ...) arise from one or other of those human tendencies ...

[  & to welcome everything as an opportuity to see if we have really let go or whether we've just talked about letting go ...

[  The post about 'I, Me Mine' was also a timely reminder. I harken back to the Millennium webcast, where deepak was introducing the Dalai Lama & giving a background into Buddhism and Vedic knowledge etc ... anyway, he said something along the lines that if he could give people just ONE piece of advice it would be that nothing should be clung to as 'me' or 'mine'. That rolls off the tongue fairly easily but just pasue and reflect on how many times you have thought about something as 'my car' or 'my opinion' or 'my body' or 'my life' or 'my children' or 'this house is mine' or 'some thoughts are experienced more personally - I call them mine' ... if one really took Deepak's little tip to heart ... the mind boggles ... well mine does anyway. :)

[     [     [     [    

"MOINKLE-TWUSBY is the lifeness."

(more mantras later)

Chris, your post reminds me of a couple of verses of one of my early efforts at poetry trying to describe my (there's that word again) experiences ... the poem is called Schizophrenia ... (the full version is somehwere at my Home Page)

I used to walk down the street
And scream at everyone I meet
So they locked me away
From the world ev'ry day

I crawled through the walls
So they showed me some normals
They strangled my mind
To help me unwind

To anyone who's still reading this ... hi, how are 'you' going ...

Chris, I may also post a story analogous to yours with the screaming old lady (I think that's how you described her) that i had a similar 'encounter' which helped shift my perspective forever - but that's a story for another 'time' ...

For those of you who are wondering ... yes, i realise that substantial chunks of this message are ego-driven ... I simply observe the fact and make no judgement about it ...

[  All my love to everyone and take good care of your selves

[  Don't forget to brush your teeth properly

[  Be excellent to each other

J  Laugh and the world laughs with you. Laugh too much and they may lock you up for some considerable time.

[  Don't take anything personally.

[  Relax and enjoy the ride - there are no refunds.

[  Treat everything you encounter as a dream.

{For more on this theme - click here}

Oh yes, before I go, I did promise you a few more mantras. I find these mantras quite useful. Your experience may vary. So long. Or as we say downunder, "No worries, mate."


"My little doctor likes to tell me all about the strangeness of my own lifetime."
"My life begins when I jump around like a mad man."
"Oimsy-oimsy-oimsy-little-oimsy."
"I'm not mad ... I am the WORK of lifetimes"
"Relax and enjoy the ride - there are no refunds."
One of my favourite mantras is "MILK IF THE NICENESS OF MILK"

(Note: these mantras work best if you happen to be in an environment such as your local psychiatric ward.)


On Thursday, October 5, 2000, Saint ()@216.34.244.105 said:
Are we only repeating history, just changing the words?

"Let he who is without ego cast the first stone."
"The egos of the fathers shall be visited upon their sons."
"Jesus died for our egos."


On Thursday, October 5, 2000, Cathy (catcta@aol.com)@205.188.197.26 said:
Peggy Enjoyed your last post--good points, I think :-) I had just come back to add that one reason some people might return to this forum which is completely NOT about vanity, is to be like the ?bohadvitas? that Geoff mentioned recently...to hang around to try to gently guide us all to what we need to "see" better...that's how I view those who seem to sit in the background most of the time...though, certainly much of the discussion helps me along too--like your last post, Peggy:-)

Namaste all!

Cathy


On Thursday, October 5, 2000, Cathy (catcta@aol.com)@205.188.197.26 said:
"This site will never be much more than a vanity site with periodic unrest thrown in..."

I have a different view of this, while I agree that much of what gets posted has to do with vanity/egos (as in my admission that I might want to *appear* insightful...and now this, being so mature as to admit mistakes! ;-) ha!)...I think that is part of the point. We come to this forum from many different places, emotionally, spritually etc...and all that we express here is part of the waking up--whatever form it might take--the ranting , the sharing of "personal" wisdom, the sharing of lives, the responses to said sharing...I think the idea that we each create our own realities however construed, is something that most of us accept...and so the fact that we are all drawn to this place or choose to return--or not-- despite what we think of things at the moment, has meaning. Perhaps we just need a place to voice "weird" ideas, perhaps we have some ego needs that need to be met before they can then be transcended---whatever. All such "interaction" --even in "real" life--with our loved ones--is the same, in my opinion :-) It's the recognition of oneness, oneconsciousness that is the only thing that changes that--btw, TO I loved that Ming quote! So, meanwhile, most of us here are not at such a point...but we are seeking to be there, however inadequately or brilliantly at present.

Lightening up is sound advice, in my book--which I should heed more often, perhaps! I appreciate this forum for it's contribution to my own not-yet realized awakening.

A closing thought...I've been considering this "mirror" analogy that gets used here a lot, and my own response that it doesn't always apply...in conjunction with the idea of our oneness or being parts of a whole expressing Itself...so, I concede that indeed if we are one, than we are all simply reflecting some aspect of the divine to each other---and with divine intention to show us what we need to see...which would mean also, that the mirror indeed has two faces...hmmm...I'm gonna sit on this one some more--not yet ready to hatch :-)

"When what is is in charge, what isn't has very little credibility and therefore very little influence." Polly Berends from Whole Child...now if I can only figure out what is what is :-)

Cathy


On Thursday, October 5, 2000, Peggy ()@209.86.49.24 said:
Ahem, that was an excellent post -- well written and thought provoking. A lot of thinking and feeling must have gone into it.

But, being who I am, I would like to address some of the things that I disagree with based on my own experiences and learning. I hope that my comments will not be taken as negative or personally critical.

You said:

"As I've read in several different sources, you lose power when you tell others what you are doing, unless the others are in complete syncronicity with your attitudes and expecatations. Otherwise, you will experience unsolicited criticism or negativity."

Ahem, Jr. addressed this one well. Much depends on the individual. If you are emotionally intelligent, the criticism of others isn't so important that it can take away your power. Except in the most extreme cases, such as brain-washing and torture, your power is under your control.

You said:

"When you do experience that criticism or negativity, you feel you have to explain and defend your statements."

Some people do and others don't. As for me, personally, I don't feel that I have to explain or defend my statements. That is something that I choose to do. For one thing, explaining my thoughts helps to clarify my own thinking for me. Further, an explaination may facilitate understanding among people. These are both positive results of honest exchange.

"This usually leads to frustration and anger."

Sometimes it leads to frustration and anger. And maybe that even happens often. Frustration can certainly be limiting but, depending on how you handle frustration, it can lead to empowerment, self-discovery, creativity and more. Anger can be an appropriate response and also beneficial. It is unhealthy when a person allows it to comsume her (him) or when it is acted out in violent ways. But anger damages a person when it is repressed. There are times, usually on a personal level, when not feeling angry is desireable. But just as often it is an element in making necessary changes in our society.

"...Especially when the person you're defending against has the tenacity of a bulldog."

Ha! Guilty! But my bark is worse than my bite!

"Wayne Dyer says arguing is just a waste of time and effort. 'It is better to be happy than to be right.'"

It wasn't a wasted effort for African-Americans, was it? I like Wayne Dyer but sometimes he makes generalizations such as this that don't hold up under close examination. I can list countless times when anger is not a waste. And the same is true of arguing. Argument doesn't always arise from anger. It can bring about needed change. It is wasted only when one side or the other is closed-minded, static, unwilling to examine another person's viewpoint.

Further, you don't always have to choose between being right and being angry. Sometimes you can be both. I do see the point, however. Some people throw the baby out with the bath water.

You said:

"And again, trying to explain {the spiritual experience} to others just lessens the experience for yourself."

That depends on the person! And it possibly depends on the experience too! I often find the spiritual experiences of others inspiring. Hadi's sharing of his experiences is an excellent example.

"Whatever you put your attention on, you get more of the same. Another thing learned the hard way. Publicly announcing here when you have a bad day or fail at relationships, like we're all guilty at doing, will just add to your bad experiences."

Or it can help to heal.

"Tell it to your dog or cat, write a letter to God, but announcing it to the world will just bring more problems. Even if you're just venting, sooner or later you will bring criticism or unsolicited advice to you..."

And you might grow.

In my opinion, if a person needs to vent almost constantly about very little annoyances (whining), then the person might benefit from counselling to develop patience and other coping skills. It is an investment in a crucial living skill. Also, if a person cannot handle criticism or if a person sees every suggestion as personal criticism that undermines her(his)feelings of self-esteem, counselling can help. As you said about meditation, it (counselling) can be one of the best things you can do for yourself.

"I really don't think you can intellectualize spirituality, like most of us have tried to do here. There are techniques that can be given and should be practiced regularly. Like Terry said, "meditate, meditate, meditate." That is the main point of Deepak's and other's. I hear a lot of people claim they don't have the time. It only takes 20 minutes for a session (though ideally it should be done twice a day). You don't have 20 minutes for one of the best things you can do for yourself? How much time do you spend watching television or movie rentals? Learning to still the mind is a much more positive thing than all of the subliminal influences you experience through the visual media."

I couldn't agree with you more!

You said:

"This site will never be much more than a vanity site with periodic unrest thrown in. There are gems thrown in among the rubble, Hadi contributing many of them and I hope he comes back."

It is often a vanity site with periodic unrest thrown in. But it is more than that. It is a place where very close friendships can be formed, insight gained, knowledge increased. It can lead to good laughs and fun times. (Geoff's posts are a good example.) It can be a resource for people looking for information on alternative medicine, meditation and helpful reading material. The list goes on and on.

You said:

"And remember, these words you type here are archived, what you say in a moment without thinking are saved for posterity..."

I wish that I could say that I'm proud of everything that I've posted. If I had the option of deleting from the archives, I would certainly take advantage of it! But maybe it is good that my shadow side stands for all to see if they want to. It won't taint the universe too much. And it is real.

Kitty, another participant here, once suggested that I read the book Emotional Intelligence. It addresses some of the issues that you have raised and might be helpful.

I wish you peace, growth, healing, insight, contentment, self-respect, independence and joy.


On Thursday, October 5, 2000, kereyra ()@132.254.130.23 said:
I suppose I asked for that Uncle Remus!! : ) Great story. Of course, I had to ask one of my southern colleague to translate for me!!

On Thursday, October 5, 2000, Bob F (TO)@165.121.48.232 said:
Yup - The very same wonderful, blissful "void".

On Thursday, October 5, 2000, to (@)@216.236.5.53 said:
" The Great Way is not difficult
for those who have no preferences.
When love and hate are both absent
everything becomes clear and undisguised.
Make the smallest distinction however
and heaven and earth are set infinitely apart."

.................................Hsin Hsin Ming


On Thursday, October 5, 2000, to (@)@216.236.5.53 said:
Not this (nothing) light!

On Thursday, October 5, 2000, Bob F ()@165.121.52.9 said:
Me thinks everyone should "lighten" up.

Namaste'




Crown/Harmony Books
Comments by users are not endorsed by Random House.

The Deepak Chopra Forum is intended to provide a place for the exchange of information, opinions, and comments. Random House does not necessarily endorse, support, sanction, encourage, verify, or agree with the comments, opinions, or statements posted in the Forum. Any information or material placed online, including advice and opinions, are the views of those who post the statements, and does not necessarily represent the views of Random House.



Privacy Policy